Wed 26 Jan 2011
	Tomorrow is court day in the case of GRETCHEN ROSSI vs JAY PHOTOGLOU, however, the following  tentative ruling has been made:
Defendant’s   request for judicial notice is denied, since it does not appear that   documents in the other 2 actions are relevant to the motion before the   Court.  Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of enforcement of judgment is denied.    The motion is premature as no judgment has yet been entered.  It is also   denied on the merits as moving party has not shown that a stay is warranted   based on the factors set forth in CCP 918.5(b).  Defendant to give notice. 
CAL. CCP. CODE § 918.5
(b) In exercising its discretion under this section, the court shall consider all of the following:
(1) The likelihood of the judgment debtor prevailing in the other action.
(2 ) The amount of  the judgment of the judgment creditor as compared to the amount of the  probable recovery of the judgment debtor in the action on the disputed  claim.
(3) The financial  ability of the judgment creditor to satisfy the judgment if a judgment  is rendered against the judgment creditor in the action on the disputed  claim.
	
													
	
	
	
 				
				
				
		
	
	
	
		Comments:	
	
	
	
	Leave a Reply