<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Addressing Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/reality-bytes/addressing-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/reality-bytes/addressing-rumors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Lovelace</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/reality-bytes/addressing-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-3720</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Lovelace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/?p=10020#comment-3720</guid>
		<description>Well maybe someone should fire off another e-mail to LLS and ask for verification.

After the Easter Holidays of course.

PS - I still have lingering problems with how Gretchen changed her website to state that only a PORTION of the proceeds from the sale of her song were going to LLS and that LLS has not received a penny to date.  She and Slade should not be taking a dime of the proceeds for themselves IMO.  That was the original implied deal and they should stick with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well maybe someone should fire off another e-mail to LLS and ask for verification.</p>
<p>After the Easter Holidays of course.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I still have lingering problems with how Gretchen changed her website to state that only a PORTION of the proceeds from the sale of her song were going to LLS and that LLS has not received a penny to date.  She and Slade should not be taking a dime of the proceeds for themselves IMO.  That was the original implied deal and they should stick with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/reality-bytes/addressing-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/?p=10020#comment-3718</guid>
		<description>I second that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizzie</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/reality-bytes/addressing-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsleftofmyhead.com/?p=10020#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>I think this is just more smoke that Wretchen is trying to blow up everyone&#039;s ass.  Anyone could have written this so-called article.

Where is the letterhead?
Who wrote the letter?  Why is no LLS representative name attached to it?
Who was the letter addressed to?

You see, when you work in a professional world, you get used to seeing &lt;b&gt;official&lt;/b&gt; correspondence.  Did you all notice that the emails received by various individuals from the LLS director had an electronic signature (name and title) and return email address on the email?  THAT is official correspondence.

This crappy little internet notice is yet another of Gretchen&#039;s frauds.  Until and unless I see a screen shot of the actual letter, including name and title of the person who wrote it, I won&#039;t believe a word of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is just more smoke that Wretchen is trying to blow up everyone&#8217;s ass.  Anyone could have written this so-called article.</p>
<p>Where is the letterhead?<br />
Who wrote the letter?  Why is no LLS representative name attached to it?<br />
Who was the letter addressed to?</p>
<p>You see, when you work in a professional world, you get used to seeing <b>official</b> correspondence.  Did you all notice that the emails received by various individuals from the LLS director had an electronic signature (name and title) and return email address on the email?  THAT is official correspondence.</p>
<p>This crappy little internet notice is yet another of Gretchen&#8217;s frauds.  Until and unless I see a screen shot of the actual letter, including name and title of the person who wrote it, I won&#8217;t believe a word of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
